Copyright @ Ministry of Law, Justice and Parliamentary Affairs, Bangladesh. Act (1) Except in a suit under the Artha Rin Adalat Ain, (Amendment) Act, (Act No. . to be an arbitration agreement under section 9 of the Salish Ain. Artha Rin Adalat Ain Bangla 01 – Download as PDF File .pdf), Text File .txt ) or read online. This principle has been incorporated in the Article 27 of Bangladesh The Artha Rin Adalat Ain is related to the loan recovery process.
|Published (Last):||4 October 2016|
|PDF File Size:||8.11 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||7.46 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Provide info to log in. In the instant case, admittedly no property was mortgaged by the principal debtor-loanee but the property was mortgaged by the petitioner. Artha Rin Adalat is a civil Court having limited jurisdiction. Sections 19 and 41 —. S ection read with Section 19 6. And remember the favor of ALLAH upon you – when you were enemies and Banglaeesh brought your hearts together and you became, by His favor, brothers.
Section read with Code of Civil Procedure, Order 21 rule These remedial provisions, they point out, deal with the defaulter borrowers disproportionately and irrationally. Please call me at the given contact number. Nothing can challenge the purchase irrespective of whatever is written in other Acts [section 12 8 of ARAA]. This Act under Section 19, gives right to the borrowers to redress grievances against judgment and decree, whether ex-parte or contested. Section 34 is not dependent upon section I and the newly constituted bangladessh No.
The Artha Rin Adalat is a special forum created by a law for adjudication of suits which can be filed by a Bank or a financial institution for recovery of its dues.
Compiled and edited by: In Order to save the valuable public time since the petitioner could not cross the first hurdle, it is not necessary to consider the other grounds of the writ petition.
The interest of the banngladesh may be hampered by a single decision which may later be used as precedent specially in the above case of financial issues. A defaulter shall mean a person or institution that obtained advance or loan or interest thereupon which becomes within the meaning as notified by the Bangladesh Bank and already expired six months.
If auction under section 12 of the Artha Rin Adalat Ain stayed by the High Court Division
artna In such a case, the period of time under section 37 of the Act would be subject to the application of the provisions of section adzlat as envisaged under sub-section 2 of section 37 of the Act. Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: The Execution Case No. If the plaint has already been filed without the property being sold, then the plaintiff has to sell the property and adjust the loan and inform the court in written form [12 2 of ARAA].
The High Court Division in its order further stated that the client shall pay taka 50 lac with in 3 months and the rest with in 18 months and in default bank can take necessary action. Whether there was any fraud or not itself is also disputed question of fact and its answer will depend on the answer to the question whether the petitioner is sdalat real owner of the flats or whether she is only custodian of the flats and the judgment-debtor No. In Civil Revision No. From the papers on the record it is seen that the defendant Nos.
Artha Rin Adalat is a civil court having limited jurisdiction. The procedure is laid down by law and is to be followed, subject only to the satisfaction of the learned Judge that such procedure is fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case. As such we hold that the Artha Rin Adalat acted beyond its jurisdiction conferred by section 5 of the Artha Rin Adalat Act— impugned orders are amenable to revisional jurisdiction under Section C.
In deciding any application the conduct of the patties need banglaeesh to he considered. It also appears from the averments made in the plaint and the papers placed on the record that said loans were given to the defendant Nos. In view of the paten inadmissibility of the counterclaim within the framework of Adalat Act, plaintiffs application under Order-7 Rule -Il can be treated as one under Section- C. Thus, there is no illegality or impropriety in the impugned order of the learned Judge of Artha Rin Adalat No.
Such investigation is dispensed with only when the court considers the claim or objection was designedly or unnecessarily delayed. The petitioner can only get any relief if, and only if, the petitioner did not have any knowledge as to the exparte decree or as to baangladesh Jari Case.
Modi congratulates Hasina on election win. In view of the above, aryha is no requirement to issue another notice before issuance of the process of arrest under section 34 1 of the Ain of at the execution stage in the name of natural justice. Moazzam Husain J dissenting.
Ahamuduz Zaman vangladesh, researcher, author, columnist, lawyer, mentor, human rights activists. Limitation—In the instant suit, the legal and correct decree was prepared and signed by the trial court on 3.
Act VIII of Section 50 3 of the Ain of gives the authority 20033 appellate Court to waive the interest, during the period of pendency of the suit and appeal if it thinks just and proper.
April 6, at The additions or differences or explanation regarding procedures are: Further the above Commerce Bank and Investment Limited, which became defunct in the year did not file the above suit. Moreover, the Appellate Division in Zahirul Islam vs.
Remedial provisions of Artha Rin Adalat Ain 2003
Artha Rin Adalat can exercise its power under Section 57 of the Ain arfha rectify its own mistake ratha restoring posses sion to respondent No. In the instant case the Adalat passed an order to make payment on four installments within one year, which means payment may he made on four installments within one year. From the sub-sections 9 and 10 of section 34 of the Ain, there is nothing to show that there is any scope of issuing any show cause notice before issuing warrant of arrest rather it appears that warrant of arrest may be issued directly.
You are commenting using your Twitter account. The petitioner being the defendants may still raise the question of liability which they did not raise at the time of framing of issues in the suit by filing an application under section 13 of the Artha Rin Adalat Ain, and the Court may, on such application, adalta upon the question of liability of the present petitioners as issues of law.
Remedial provisions of Artha Rin Adalat Ain
But the law enjoins a strict compliance 2030 the provision in its true purport and spirit. Non-recording of any direction regarding payment of interest from the date of filing of the suit till realization of the decretal amount in the judgment and decree by the Adalat does not go the affect the right of the decree holder for charging the payment of interest as provided under section 50 of the Ain. Section 26 of the Ain of has expressly debarred application of the provisions of other statutes including the Code of Civil Procedure pending execution proceedings so far it is inconsistent with the provisions of the Ain of